Nursing Article Critique
Nurses commonly utilize research to answer the questions in their area of specialization to improve the quality of care for the patients, solve problems, and identify impending issues that demand more research so that they can efficiently shape policy in the healthcare sector. The nurses who are confronted by questions about their area of practice and policy must have active and superior skills in evidence-based research. Accessible articles for research are usually based on peer-reviewed journals, and they are associated with some challenges in their review to ensure that the standards of scholarly competence are evident in the article. However, the criteria may differ based on the report the reviewer has selected. Thus, it becomes necessary that a context is availed to the nurses that serve as a guide to proper article critique and reading the articles.
When making the right decision on reading a specific article, the nursing writer must evaluate the reader’s interest in the particular area that the article addresses. The reader might be interested in accessing a specific research article to be read and criticized; therefore, it is crucial to contemplate some questions in the process.
Does the title give a defined description of the article?
An expert shall have a higher chance to reflect the readers’ interests. Still, the full realization is accomplished after reading the article in consideration that the title has a full description. Communications of the chief principle in the article, the variables as well as the methods used are given by a claim that is enlightening enough.
Is the abstract representation of the article?
The abstract is supposed to replicate the outlook in a brief description so that it can efficiently address the study, research methodology, research question, and documented results together with the conclusions arrived at after the work is done. This is the attention of an informed decision on whether the article is right or wrong. Most people rely on the abstract to get the information in the section, and little effort is made to read the article thoroughly. This is a wrong tactic because the abstract is a pure reflection of the whole article, and the potential misleading of the reader cannot be overlooked.
Does the introduction make the purpose of the article clear?
The introduction must be briefly written because it forms a significant part of the paper’s success. In the introduction, the problem statement is integrated, the rationale of the study, and the research question. And if the hypothesis report is needed, it comes with the introduction. A brief reflection of expected results is also highlighted in the introduction section.
Is a theoretical framework described?
If the paper has to have a theoretical framework, then it is supposed to inform the study when presenting the rationale. The concepts highlighted in the conceptual framework should have a clear direction to the paper’s topic and serve as the basis for the interpretation of results. The majority of researchers, however, ignore theoretical frameworks such as the research conducted in the arena of health services which address issues such as health care accessibility and the costs associated with the delivery of healthcare. Clinical research that addresses a comparative analysis of the effectiveness of two drugs does not require a theoretical framework. Are you looking For the nursing article critique? Order Now From nursing writing services.
